Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Flash | arturetges | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Flash | aleister95 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Selesnya Gearhulk | kram1138 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | ninomtg | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12761315 |
| Azorius Control | andoru011120 | 4-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Midrange , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo
Meta Performance Analysis
Devout Decree ranks #162 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 52%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 53.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Devout Decree is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 14.20 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.6%. Devout Decree has a win rate of 66.2%, making it 7.5% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Devout Decree than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 5 | 79.5% | 68.0% | +11.6% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 5 | 77.8% | 66.7% | +11.1% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 5 | 77.8% | 67.7% | +10.1% |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 5 | 77.8% | 72.0% | +5.8% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 67.3% | 68.4% | -1.1% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 11 | 67.3% | 69.7% | -2.3% |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 2 | 6 | 65.0% | 67.5% | -2.5% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 11 | 66.7% | 69.4% | -2.7% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 10 | 63.8% | 67.3% | -3.5% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 8 | 64.2% | 68.1% | -3.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 153 | 42.9% | 56.2% |
| Selesnya Cage | 39 | 15.6% | 65.9% |
| Boros Burn | 17 | 4.4% | 19.6% |
| Mono White Tokens | 15 | 2.5% | 54.7% |
| Azorius Glyph | 13 | 11.3% | 81.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.